(meredith) important for next round, to choose a subject matter where you can control the imagery yourself.
(denise) reminds her of early nineties experiments with technology and interface design. she wants to know what can you bring from the physical world into the online world but adapt it to make sense to the constraints of the new platform, keeping in mind that the early experiments failed, how can your design thinking reinterpret new approaches now.
(santiago) can the advocate interact with the parent during the review process as well?
(angela) appreciates how you crossed between navigation and information into what she calls an application. by pushing data in, you were creating meta data,,, which made the information experience work and much richer.
great the you broke down different ways of reading the information. its not about just navigating through information but about collecting info as one moves through the system... the system becomes intelligent as you move through it
video presentation became limiting. wished it was a little bit more informative. takes up 75% of the screen, so it would be best to figure out how to get more of visual information as one moves through the information
good job of accommodating many styles of information all of them together.
think of ways in which the data drives the design experience.
how to build one context after another....
(scott) imagery is very sentimentalized, and to him, shows no kind of autistic behaviors. photography might not be the way to go?
(santiago) not either or, but look at the function that these visuals will need to serve.
(angela) play with the interface and fill it in with many kinds of images (cartoons, illustrations) that will allow you to see how they behave.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment